21 March 2010

Asking the right questions?

Framing or in other words asking the correct question, is probably more important than the answer itself. A correct question will probably achieve more than an answer, for an answer needs mainly memory where as the question will often require intelligence and analysis.

Why should anyone question in the first place? This is because we most often become what we question.
Rene Descartes said "I think therefore I am."

The questions referred to here are not the general type of conversational ones. The reference here is rather to those questions that have a bearing on our personal lives and work; in fact to our very being and existence.

For our discussion's sake, there are mainly two types of people in this world.
First the reasonable people and secondly the unreasonable people.
The reasonable people don't ask questions and accept the way things are, they adjust themselves to fit into existing structures, systems and environments.
Unreasonable people don't accept the status quo and hence ask questions, they try to change things and the environment to to meet their expectations.
Thus it would be reasonable to state that all development, change or progress can only be brought about by 'unreasonable people', the ones who question.

Not all questioning need be public or loud. Mikhail Gorbachev, had many questions but kept them to himself and a few trusted lieutenants. He became the General Secretary of the Soviet communist party and leader of Soviet Union in March 11th 1985.
Soon after he became leader, he moved with rapidity to introduce real reform, which led to dismantling of the Soviet Union and weakened communism and eventually helped usher in a new world order. The merits of the question are not being discussed, just the implications are.

On the other hand, vociferous questioners are often perceived as trouble-makers, rebels and 'unreasonable people.'
Not all questioners have good or noble intentions and 'churn the pot' merely for purposes of entertainment or to seek attention.

Are they necessarily bad, evil or useless?
On the contrary, by their actions, these loud protestors, demonstrate clearly that they possess energy and some presence of mind. This is not always bad, as an effective person or leader can actually engage such questioners and channelise this energy to useful purposes.

Unfortunately our education system and society frowns upon anyone who raises any questions. The system comprising, homes, educational institutions, job environment is currently spawning generations of people who are more adept at answering questions rather than asking them.

Why then should we decry the rise of bigotry, prejudices, violence and continuing decline of our society?

8 comments:

  1. Dr BSKS Chopra said.
    That was a nice issue discussed and well presented.Thanks.BSKS

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Priti Quinn said:

    This was a well written and not a meandering blog.
    Bravo!! old chap!

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Zahir Meher-Homji said;

    When I lived in the San Francisco Bay Area I attended a graduation ceremony at Stanford University. One of the graduates-- the very intelligent Dr Naushad Forbes (whom you know).

    The speaker on that day wrote the Dewnsbury cartoon script.His message to every outgoing graduate was ___ASK THE IMPERTINENT QUESTION !!

    I think the education system in America--though very flawed--gets the message across to have big balls and not be scared to ask questions. Very unlike the Brits who made us way to polite.
    Well thats my opinion Rainy. Thanks for stimulating the brain and Happy Navroze coz you are half a bawa.
    Z.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Karamjit SIngh Duggal said

    Interesting, again.......

    Not sure that Gorbachev got it right......China has managed its transition from communism towards a free-market economy far more effectively [even though it's not there yet], because they did it in a gradual & phased manner. Russia let it's economy implode, didn't give itself enough time to build the necessary free market environment and economic strength before it dismantled it's communist infrastructure. It's now a second-rate economic power with lot of oil and a lot nukes, ....and no real modern economic strengths [manufacturing, knowledge industries,....].......subtract it's oil / gas income and it's GDP will be much less than India's.......[with oil/gas, it's about 15% higher].

    Interesting concept: "bigotry, prejudices, violence" are a natural part of an open society, not necessarily symptoms of a declining society......Suppress these, and free speech and free exchange of ideas also gets suppressed........

    KS

    ReplyDelete
  8. Gorbachev, screwed up big time.

    He tried political freedom first hoping that economic freedom will follow.

    The Chinese went the opposite way . They have repressive political policies but relatively open economic freedom.

    History shows that economies with a single political party in power or dictatorial political scenarios following a capitalistic business model have done best in economic terms. Japan, Singapore, Taiwan and Korea are leading examples.

    I agree with the numbers that you mention on Russian economy but Russia will rise dramatically. Here are some thoughts;

    The political power was ineffectively centralised in Russia but economic activity was decentralised across the entire Soviet Union and the satellite countries of the former Warsaw pact countries like Poland, Romania, Bulgaria , Czechoslovakia.

    The soviet Union disintegrated and exploded while Russia imploded.
    Russia is learning but with great difficulty to partner rather than bully its neighbours and that will lead to better performance for Russia in the long term.

    Russia is rebuilding its economy on back of oil & gas revenues and transiting from first wave agricultural economy and second wave Industrial economy with a larger share of the third wave of post industrial economy. This will take time. Russia has a semi dictatorial regime bringing back order and centralisation.

    Only a strong functioning centralised system can make an effective and successful transition to a decentralised system.

    In the next decade you will see Russia emerge much stronger.

    We have to remember that India is moving ahead at a good trot and the gap with Russia can only widen.

    Cheers

    Gurvinder

    ReplyDelete

Entrepreneurs, professionals and entrefessional

I will digress here to explain my analysis of the difference between entreprenuers professionals & entrefessionals.  I don't really...