26 June 2012

Tyrants in Uniform





School bullies rob younger and weaker children of whatever catches their fancy, be it their lunch, toys or money. The weak merely surrender whatever they have to avoid a beating or other forms of torment.

A majority of citizens are timid and therefore face the same situation. Hapless citizens are incessantly bullied and tormented by the entity of the faceless and nameless government supposedly for ‘the greater good of the people' or some other nonsense.  The notorious brigade include tax officials, policemen, various inspectors, most bureaucrats and politicians. 
We can’t paint everyone with the same brush, not all officials are bad or evil. Unfortunately the bullies now form the dominant majority.

___________________________

Nowadays no social interaction is complete without a reference to corruption. Everyone grumbles but few do anything, to free us from the heavy yoke of our own government's corruption and apathy. 

Confined within our homes most of us are mere armchair activists.  Complaining and finger pointing, we merely talk and talk. Talk after all is cheap and assuages us of our feeling of guilt and inaction. Talk is not completely useless because it primes individuals for action, waiting for someone to light the match. 

An assistant commissioner of police of Mumbai ACP Dhobale is now in the middle of a media and social storm. Only the courts and time will tell if this man with a controversial past is an overenthusiastic law enforcer, or an inquisitor-tyrant on a rampage to fulfill a hidden agenda.
However the actions raise some important issues, which should serve as a call for fixing many things gone wrong in our society and what needs to be done to control the corruption of power.

Mere outrage and anger will result in the occasional flare up only to fizzle out. Powerful change can only occur when well conceived strategies and plans are implemented sincerely by committed people. 
Napoleon once remarked, "Evil things happen not because of the deeds of a few bad men, they are the result of the apathy and silence of the majority of the people." 

________________________________________

People have exhausted themselves, fruitlessly attacking the symptoms rather than the disease. The root cause of the disease of corruption is the massive number of laws vesting dangerous punitive powers in almost every officer in the government. Even the junior-most officer can put in jail any member of the public with a snap of his or her fingers. 

The constantly demonstrated ability to obstruct normal life whether personal, social or professional is more frightening than any physical weapon. The harried citizens have to spend huge resources of money and time in legal fees, bribes and the courts just to prove their innocence or to get what is rightly due to them as envisaged in our constitution.

To make matters worse there is no effective system to redress complaints of the people. Where and to whom can the frustrated and exhausted citizen turn to?

In addition to throwing the legal book at citizens, many government officials cruelly leverage the media to their advantage and hammer the oppressed people by issuing malicious statements in the newspapers and television about the person being charged with some offense or the other.

Often destroying reputations and lives thoughtlessly, the media's focus unfortunately has shifted from providing balanced news to entertainment, and nothing entertains more than the whiff of scandal.

Preventing corruption is better than trying to cure it. Here are some ways to mitigating the menace of corruption;
        Reduce by 95% the discretionary and instant punitive powers of individual government officers.
        Introduce an effective system to redress complaints of the citizens and this should form part of the senior officers duties and action taken must be open to public scrutiny.
        Form panels headed by eminent citizens consisting of experts from various professional bodies including respected and competent lawyers. These panels must review ALL laws within the next five years, withdraw, modify or add laws that are needed. It is estimated that more than 90% of the laws are either irrelevant or outdated and mostly unduly complex and sometimes even convoluted. Laws passed by colonialists to oppress the native people and monopolies benefits for a privileged few, are still in existence, empowering new indigenous tyrants to perpetuate misery.
        Introduce guidelines that, unless genuine and valid objections are raised by government officials applications to government departments and officers should be deemed to be automatically sanctioned.
        Hold to serious account by law,  government officers for misuse of their position and also for dereliction of their duties.

Reduce the powers of government and other officers to bully, to act arbitrarily to arrest people, to hamper their livelyhood, etc. for most matters and instead follow a system of due process of law. 

Barring exceptional circumstances alleged offenders should be given notice and permitted to defend themselves before a court of law before being condemned by the authorities and the media.

A man in uniform now represents something not to be respected but feared and even despised. Let us return to the time when the badge sported and the uniform of a government official was something that provided us the people a sense of respect, support, security, and justice. 

Bullies are impatient people and pursue instant gratification. Deny them this right to bully, harass, obstruct and destroy and most of the frivolous or mischievous cases of harassment will die a natural death.
True, a few offenders may escape the net of the law but surely countless innocent people will also escape the harassment of corrupt officials.



2 comments:

  1. Ok the above points look to be a very idealist approach to solving one of countries biggest problem "The Corruption"but think about it practically and rationally whether it can be implemented.

    You say reduce 95% of the discretionary and instant punitive powers of individual government officers. Simple and how do you do it? once done then what happens? How would the work be then carried out once we do not have their approval. Any light may be you can throw on this???

    About forming panels and now on what criteria do you select a panel and how can you be so sure that these panels cannot be swayed with the lure of gains. And i believe many laws have been amended keeping view of the recent times.

    I seriously do not understand on what you mean by "Introduce guidelines that, unless genuine and valid objections are raised by government officials applications to government departments and officers should be deemed to be automatically sanctioned."Instead do not you think it would be better if we have no democratic government and just have an anarchy?

    Finally the biggest hurdle in achieving the above goals is the seriously flawed taxation system. Let me give you an example of Denmark which by all standards you may call a corruption free country.

    Danish tax examples as of 2010:

    If you have what is considered a very low income (DKK 150,000, USD 26,550) you pay approx. DKK 44,500 in income tax (including gross tax), i.e. approx. 29.7% of the full amount.

    If you have what is considered a very low income (DKK 150,000, USD 26,550), and you pay DKK 20,000 annually in interest, you pay approx. DKK 38,000 in income tax (including gross tax), i.e. approx. 25.3% of the full amount.

    If you have what is considered an average income (DKK 375,000, USD 66,370) you pay approx. DKK 134,800 in income tax, i.e. approx. 35.9% of the full amount.

    If you have what is considered an average income (DKK 375,000, USD 66,370), and you pay DKK 30,000 annually in interest, you pay approx. DKK 125,100 in income tax, i.e. approx. 33.04% of the full amount.

    If you have what is considered a high income (DKK 780,000, USD 138,050), you pay approx. DKK 351,200 in income tax, i.e. approx. 45.0% of the full amount.

    If you have what is considered a high income (DKK 780,000, USD 138,050), and you pay at least DKK 50,000 annually in interest, you pay approx. DKK 334,900 in income tax, i.e. approx. 42.9% of the full amount.

    (Plus a 25% VAT on all goods)

    Understand a major part of this revenue is utilized in paying the government servents (And their income is so high that they never feel the need to engage in petty bribes).

    Now compare this with India. Are we willing to pay such a high taxation so that the infrastructure of the country improves?? If there are people willing to pay 30% of their income such that a police constable might have enough to buy his children decent clothes and he does not have to commit bribery.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dr. Blasphemy,

      I do not underestimate the magnitude of the problem of corruption.
      The powers to various government officers to punish anyone is by a process of legislation.
      It can be done by a process of legislation where lawyers, and representatives from various sections of society form part of the team that drafts the laws and guidelines. In this case it will be redrafting the rules and laws and procedures.

      Economic crimes and corruption is not undertaken by the poor but by many who are already enormously wealthy.

      After the 6th pay commission, today the government employees form the top 1% of earners in our country.

      Taxes both direct and indirect may be a necessary evil. Why such a bloated and inefficient and ineffective government machinery? Why not pay people well but use only 25% of the manpower?

      In Denmark the Prime Minister cycles to his office alone, why do we need 27 car convey for our Prime Minister & President and other ministers?

      Governments when divorced from the people especially the ones effected by the laws then there is corruption. Involve the people and keep the general good in mind and 90% of corruption can be eliminated.

      Delete

Entrepreneurs, professionals and entrefessional

I will digress here to explain my analysis of the difference between entreprenuers professionals & entrefessionals.  I don't really...