01 January 2012

Time to use Ostrakas?

One of the objectives of writing this blog is to force myself to think out of the box, or think differently within the box.

Protests all over the world including India on how a few individuals destroy the peace of mind of the vast majority. Provided below is a 2600 year old concept borrowed from history.

Long ago there existed in Europe several powerful city states. A fine example was Athens, which had with great difficulty got rid of the petty tyrants and introduced a very successful democracy which lasted several hundred years.

As is well known democracies give rise to a peculiar problem.  Some people claiming to work in the  interest for the people but really working for themselves game the system. They distort the basic goodness of democracy and corrupt democracy and entrench themselves completely. 

Once in power these self centered power maniacs are almost impossible to eliminate.  The Athenians recognised that such people left to their antics would divide the people into factions  and unnecessarily cause anxiety to the people. They had to find a solution.

The solution the people of Athens evolved was the system of 'ostracism', wherein each year one high profile person, mostly a leader, who become haughty, rude, inconsiderate, scheming etc and was likely to cause anxiety to the people, was banished into exile for 10 years from Athens.

The simple procedure required the Athenian citizens to gather in the market place and write the name of the person who they thought should be banished on ostrakas (pieces of broken pottery) which were used as voting tokens. At that time papyrus was imported from Egypt and hence expensive whereas  ostrakas were abundant and cheaply available.  The citizens scribbled the name of the person they wanted on their individual  ostraka and the person who got most number of ostrakas ( but with a minimum of 6000 ostrakas) was exiled for 10 years.

Many powerful people such as Astrides the most powerful general who defeated the Persians at Marathon was exiled in 490 B.C. and as was the famous and powerful general Themistocles in 472 B.C because they became haughty and did not care for the people but only about themselves.

The selfish system is slightly odd because the person is exiled even without being guilty. The citizens decide to punish someone first and then decide who it had to be.

This unusual practice forced leaders to take into consideration the opinion of most of the citizens and those that were socially inferior to them. Ostracism was a simply a pragmatic preventive measure that ensured no one ever became to big for his boots. The exiled person did not suffer any monetary loss or property confiscation etc, he or she just had to remove their presence from the community. 

Would it not be a great idea if each year the citizens could banish one person who they believe is causing anxiety to the people from a village, taluka, district, municipal corporation, state and at the national level.

If this idea were ever implemented I wonder;
  • In this age of technology distance may not be a barrier anymore for troublesome people to cause anguish 
  • Who would provide residence and asylum to these wretched people who would be exiled. 

10 comments:

  1. Dr. Fazal Sayyed said;

    Sir,
    Your articles are really good, wish you and your family a very happy new year.

    Fazal
    fazalphysio@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anita Kalsi said;

    thanks for sharing

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dr. BSKS Chopra said;

    A very good point and very well resolved in those days, But we cant
    banish people these days.
    BSKS

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dear Dr. Chopra,

    In addition to being my friend you are also my teacher.
    The seed may be born at one place only to grow into a massive tree elsewhere, so it is with the ideas we throw up.

    Here are some prime locations for these unpleasant people.
    Why can't we banish these people to several remote islands where they have no access to any form of telecommunication?
    What about other states far away where they have no local support to create that much mischief.
    or to Saudi Arabia where all the despots deemed unsuitable to the Western world go to retire after being dethroned
    Chinese companies are sending all their political prisoners to Middle East and to placs like Dubai to participate in the construction activities of Chinese state owned construction companies. Maybe an idea can be born from there.

    The point is we only have to do it to a few people and then it reminds nasty people to remain low profile and not to trouble the masses.

    Even though it seems a fanatsy at this time I am hopeful that it will give birth to a more workable variaton of containing the menace of troublesome leaders.

    Gurvinder

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anil Pillai said;


    Great plan Gurvinder. Given the size an extent of the problem in our country we probably need to "Ostrakas" a 1000 people every year/month but a great idea nevertheless.

    Anil

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ranjit Rai said;


    Thanks Gurvinder as a Fool, Sorry I mean Philospher ( All philosophers are fools but all fools are not philospphers) I enjoyed you well thought blog out but Caste system will make sure even the OSTRAKAS system fails in India ..........We are different ...we belive in next life.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Dear Ranjit ji,

    Thanks for your witty and pointed observation.

    I am endeavouring to create a community of people who share similar values. God willingly we can collaborate, partner, share our ideas and resources to forge a new, vibrant, healthy and higher global community.
    It may take a very long time but patient and persistent people always win in the end.

    God Bless
    Regards

    Gurvinder

    ReplyDelete
  8. Uday Phillar said;

    This will not work in India because our politicos are much smarter. Among their favourite pre emptive strategies are :

    1) large familes
    2) dual citizenships
    3) easy availability of residential rights in Western countries for victims of political vendetta
    4) tax havens
    5) cosy cronyism that makes action nearly impossible.

    Rgds
    Uday
    udayphilar@hotmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hello Uday,

    I agree with you.
    However the day we accept status quo for something not right we are in a sense doomed.
    I write to provoke myself and others to try and make this world a better and interesting place.

    The power of an idea should never be underestimated.

    Thanks for your thoughts

    Cheers

    Gurvinder

    ReplyDelete
  10. Shyam Tampi said,

    Very thought provoking Rainy ! I vote we ban/exile one every day ! Even then, we would be falling short- for we have so many of them in positions of power and ruining this country !!

    Cheers,

    Shyam Tampi.
    shyamtampi@yahoo.co.in

    ReplyDelete

Entrepreneurs, professionals and entrefessional

I will digress here to explain my analysis of the difference between entreprenuers professionals & entrefessionals.  I don't really...